|
|
Post by Broncos GM (Kevin) on Jul 7, 2022 4:09:17 GMT -5
GBP sends
George Kittle, WAS - 22: $5.0M
DEN sends
2023 picks
1st (TEN)
1st (WAS)
Denver accepts, moving to add a stud TE and I still have my extension I can use
Thanks Josh, good luck with the rebuild
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2022 5:36:14 GMT -5
Packers accept
I hate to lose Kittles but with no way to extend other than a franchise tag I had to move on thanks and good luck to the Broncos this season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2022 5:56:58 GMT -5
Approve 1-0
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Jul 7, 2022 6:58:09 GMT -5
GBP sends George Kittle, WAS - 22: $5.0M DEN sends 2023 picks 1st (TEN) 1st (WAS) Denver accepts, moving to add a stud TE and I still have my extension I can use Thanks Josh, good luck with the rebuild Extension cannot be used on Kittle, under current contract the 2022 contract options period has ended, and Kittle can only be franchised. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2022 6:58:25 GMT -5
Accepted on MFL
|
|
|
|
Post by Broncos GM (Kevin) on Jul 7, 2022 7:09:37 GMT -5
GBP sends George Kittle, WAS - 22: $5.0M DEN sends 2023 picks 1st (TEN) 1st (WAS) Denver accepts, moving to add a stud TE and I still have my extension I can use Thanks Josh, good luck with the rebuild Extension cannot be used on Kittle, under current contract the 2022 contract options period has ended, and Kittle can only be franchised. OK fair enough but that's a rule that needs to change, but it does say open on the Contract extension sub forum legacynfl.boards.net/board/66/contract-extensionsthat's what I based the trade on, Kittle is no use to me on a 1 yr contract I'm not in play this season |
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Jesse) on Jul 7, 2022 7:12:02 GMT -5
Lets go ahead and void this trade. Contract extensions have passed so if that's a key reason for the deal no need to push this through. I'll try to remove the
"Open" from the proboards title, but extensions have been closed for months.
|
|
|
|
Post by Broncos GM (Kevin) on Jul 7, 2022 7:17:35 GMT -5
Lets go ahead and void this trade. Contract extensions have passed so if that's a key reason for the deal no need to push this through. I'll try to remove the "Open" from the proboards title, but extensions have been closed for months. I don't like voiding the trade, I went to the Packers and he, in good faith, accepted my offer. It's my error and I'm happy to stand by it. I'll sell on Kittle at a discount to a contender for a lesser TE hopefully... I almost never TAG, there's no value in that imo even TE. |
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Jesse) on Jul 7, 2022 8:08:50 GMT -5
Lets go ahead and void this trade. Contract extensions have passed so if that's a key reason for the deal no need to push this through. I'll try to remove the "Open" from the proboards title, but extensions have been closed for months. I don't like voiding the trade, I went to the Packers and he, in good faith, accepted my offer. It's my error and I'm happy to stand by it. I'll sell on Kittle at a discount to a contender for a lesser TE hopefully... I almost never TAG, there's no value in that imo even TE. Alright, let's open voting back up then. |
|
|
|
Post by Lions GM on Jul 7, 2022 8:15:04 GMT -5
APPROVE 2
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington GM (Blaine) on Jul 7, 2022 8:18:15 GMT -5
I’m going to veto this one, two 1sts is too much for a 1 year TE
Veto 1-2
|
|
|
|
Post by Browns GM (Dan) on Jul 7, 2022 9:43:28 GMT -5
Agreed, two 1sts for a 1yr TE is not a fair price.
Veto 2-2
|
|
|
|
Post by Broncos GM (Kevin) on Jul 7, 2022 9:51:01 GMT -5
One yr plus possible tags, how many can he have? 2?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lions GM on Jul 7, 2022 10:25:21 GMT -5
Yes 2.so could have for 3 years
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Anthony) on Jul 7, 2022 11:08:57 GMT -5
Veto
Lots to trade for one year TE
Could easily be re worked
|
|
