|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Mar 2, 2021 11:43:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Browns GM (Dan) on Mar 2, 2021 12:55:41 GMT -5
Wilson isn't an issue here though right as his first extension wasn't based on the first extension QB rate, but based on 150%. Now his 2nd extension is also based on 150%. Obviously if you confirmed verbally that he would be on 16m then that's a LM decision to make.
To solve the rule all we would need to do is change the 2nd QB minimum to be 18m (or the 1st to be reduced to 10.5m, or a combo of the two - 11m and 16.5m?), a fair thing to do would be ask teams who have a QB extended this year if they are happy with the extension or not. If not then the extension can be reverted. Might cause an issue with trades, however I don't see any reason any team would reject the change as they're all getting QBs at less than FA rates.
Removing the 2nd extension might be something going forwards so that teams cannot have players below market value for up to 11 years which also removes any issue with this rule, though thats a totally different point for a future offseason meeting.
In a seperate point, could we please change the colour of the amendment on the contract extension rule (And any others done like this) to be black rather than red/orange as it reads as though it is an old rule which has been written out rather than something being written in.
Fully appreciate looking into this so fast Frank, I know all too well that too much time of a Dynasty League Commissioner is spent putting out fires and inadvertantly causing other ones that you don't notice until later.
|
|
