|
|
Post by Browns GM (Dan) on Mar 15, 2023 19:32:10 GMT -5
I think we need to add a rule to cover for any future cancelled games as happened for the Bills v Bengals game this season. We just need to decide what to use: - 0 for all players who took part in the cancelled game, even if some of the game had been played
- Points as they were when the game was cancelled
- PPG for the season to that point for all the players who were meant to play in the cancelled game
- Use the MFL predicted scores for all the players who were meant to play in the cancelled game
- Something else.
If the game is left in a state of indecision (as we had for the Bills v Bengals) then once we reach the end of a gameweek (Thursday am when MFL stat changes take affect) then this rule will take affect. If the game gets replayed in the future then no points will be changed or added.
The above can obviously get written more eloquently once we have decided on the terms of the bylaw. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2023 22:12:31 GMT -5
I vote for PPG, that would be closer to the randomness of an actual game, has your player been on special teams half the season, so PPG would be lower? Did the player have an outlier high game?
I see the argument with treating it as if that player got injured and couldn't play anymore either, so using the points at the time of stoppage is applicable, though may be harder to calculate
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Anthony) on Mar 15, 2023 23:05:19 GMT -5
Agree with Joe
|
|
|
|
Post by Broncos GM (Kevin) on Mar 16, 2023 1:34:26 GMT -5
Yep ppg is sensible
|
|
|
|
Post by Eagles GM (Joe) on Mar 16, 2023 10:50:54 GMT -5
I like PPG too unless it’s at the start of the season. If it were literally week 1 then I’d assume we are going with the predicted points right? Just making sure to clarify that point
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Mar 18, 2023 12:34:27 GMT -5
I think Joe's proposal (and follow-up) makes sense. Perhaps the bylaw could incorporate both, the predicted points and the average ppg, depending on the time of occurrence.
As an example, maybe the 1st half of the season (Weeks 1-9) would be based on predictions, whereas Weeks 10-17 take the average.
Additionally, both would be subject to the terms/points of a game that is rescheduled.
|
|
|
|
Post by Browns GM (Dan) on Mar 18, 2023 12:47:37 GMT -5
I think Joe's proposal (and follow-up) makes sense. Perhaps the bylaw could incorporate both, the predicted points and the average ppg, depending on the time of occurrence. As an example, maybe the 1st half of the season (Weeks 1-9) would be based on predictions, whereas Weeks 10-17 take the average. Additionally, both would be subject to the terms/points of a game that is rescheduled. I think that makes sense apart from the final line. We couldn't change points for a week 3 games that gets rearranged for week 11 for example. Whatever we decide would have to be locked as final at the end of any given week (Thursday Stat Changes) The only week we could wait to see if a game is rearranged is our Superbowl. |
|
