|
|
Post by Browns GM (Dan) on Mar 15, 2024 15:54:37 GMT -5
The Cleveland Browns Trade:
Joe Mixon (RB - Hou) $6,000,000 (2024) EXT
Chicago Bears 2024 3rd Round Pick (3.25)
Washington Commanders 2024 5th Round Pick (5.22)
Cleveland Browns 2025 4th Round Pick
The Baltimore Ravens Trade:
Philadelphia Eagles 2024 1st Round Pick (1.20)
Baltimore Ravens 2025 1st Round Pick
Baltimore Ravens 2025 5th Round Pick
Proposed and Accepted on MFL
A divisonal deal to improve a rival and provide me with some ammo to make some more deals this offseason
|
|
|
|
Post by Ravens GM (Nate) on Mar 15, 2024 17:19:39 GMT -5
Ravens accept. Making sure I get help at RB which has been a struggle, pairing Mixon with Williams has me feeling pretty good! Thanks Browns for the talks!
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington GM (Blaine) on Mar 15, 2024 19:46:03 GMT -5
I’ve been thinking this one over, it seems like an awful lot to pay for a 1 year RB. I think even if Mixon was on a multi year deal two 1sts is pretty steep.
I’m going to put in a Veto, especially considering it’s a division trade. Ravens could be giving up an amount that could be detrimental to the future of their team.
Veto 1-1
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Anthony) on Mar 15, 2024 19:56:09 GMT -5
Mixon is UFA?
I read that as extended….did I read that wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cowboys GM (Frank) on Mar 16, 2024 1:14:02 GMT -5
Approve 2
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Anthony) on Mar 16, 2024 8:45:39 GMT -5
Has mixon been extended or is he a UFA?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Anthony) on Mar 16, 2024 9:43:30 GMT -5
Removed my approval until tht gets confirmed
Our league doesn’t allow two extensions anymore , does Baltimore know that as well
A true rental if that is the case
|
|
|
|
Post by Titans GM (Ricky) on Mar 16, 2024 12:34:34 GMT -5
Veto 1-2
With the news rules you could technically keep Mixon longer than a year under the FT. Still it is hard for me to wrap my head around how this really helps the Ravens in the short or long term.
It's a team adding a 1yr RB while not currently having a starting QB on the roster. Ravens do still have plenty of time to figure out the QB situation by tag or other means. Right now though it doesn't look or feel right to add a one year RB to this roster. Imo being a division rival trade raises the potential risk of creating a wide divisional gap which would hurt the league as a whole. Sorry guys I really hate to veto. For myself if the Ravens got a better pick back than a late 3rd with Mixon while not sending a pick I'd probably be more willing to try leaning to an approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Falcons GM (Andy) on Mar 16, 2024 13:15:59 GMT -5
Veto 1-3 too much for a rental
|
|
|
|
Post by Ravens GM (Nate) on Mar 16, 2024 15:05:30 GMT -5
It’s fine guys, no drama, but just so you guys know the process with the trade:
1) Dan was just stating that Mixon had been extended once already, meaning he couldn’t be again. I can see where that was confusing.
2) my intention was to use the FT and maybe the extension (per the new rule) for him, so it would be a minimum of 2yrs, with the possibility of more.
3) I’ve had an abysmal record of trying to fix the RB position every year I’ve been here lol. Williams is the lone bright spot there. I felt like solving the position for 2yrs or more was worth the picks, especially as I had a couple extra.
4) maybe we could come up with a general, ballpark guide to values, like the one that most of the NFL uses? I’ve seen some pretty egregious deals passed without a single veto vote, and it just feels like we could use some more guidance there so that we are all on the same page and for consistency.
Just some thoughts going forward! Thanks for looking out for the league!
|
|
