|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Oct 7, 2014 11:08:13 GMT -5
3 years @ 0.46 + RFA= 3.46 points
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2014 17:01:01 GMT -5
3 yrs @ 0.60 + RFA =3.6 pts
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2014 17:01:04 GMT -5
3 yrs @ 0.60 + RFA =3.6 pts
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Oct 7, 2014 17:43:32 GMT -5
Aren't these bids illegal as to form?
plus rfa = 1 pt.
needs reference link to rfa status
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Oct 8, 2014 11:06:30 GMT -5
Your right Darryl, we have gotten away from that lately, and we need to get back to the rules. Good catch, thank you.
3 years @ 0.46 + RFA = 4.46 points
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 8, 2014 20:45:50 GMT -5
Based on the rules and previous bids, you do not gain a point for RFA status when bidding on Rookies. You only gain a point for RFA status when bidding on Veterans. The Rams and Steelers original bids are valid. The Rams most recent bid (3 years @ 0.46 + RFA = 4.46 points) is incorrect.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Oct 9, 2014 9:40:35 GMT -5
I stand corrected, thanks Browns. My sincere apologies for any confusion. It's quite a bit to distinguish between differing rules of the same nature.
In our quest for "RFA Clarification", it was established that a rookie becomes a vet after he has appeared in 6 games. We have only played 5 games to date. Lynch has appeared in all 5 of those games and is thus still considered a rookie, NOT eligible for the RFA point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Oct 10, 2014 10:10:01 GMT -5
This whole point addition for RFA has been a point of confusion ever since this league started. I really don't understand why the rule was adopted this way to begin, maybe it's something that we should just abolish, unless someone can explain why we have it and its reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Oct 10, 2014 10:13:31 GMT -5
WON BY STEELERS
|
|
