Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2021 12:07:44 GMT -5
Cincinnati Bengals Send:
Joyner, Lamarcus (NYJ S) $2.10 2021 UFA
Year 2022 Round 2 Draft Pick from Detroit Lions
Houston Texans send
Aiyuk, Brandon SFO WR $1.50 2024 UFA
Bannals send this offer to again add some depth in a much needed area. We are spending our draft capital, but feel it's needed. Grabbing Aiyuk was something I'm willing to take a gamble on. He has talent, but has been the 4th option this year. Hoping he bounces back.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2021 17:02:03 GMT -5
Texans accept
I’m gathering picks for next year as it’s time to sort this s*** show of a team out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Titans GM (Ricky) on Sept 22, 2021 17:44:36 GMT -5
Is this trade valid since it doesn't get the Texans to the roster minimum? Not sure how we are approaching teams that are under or over rosters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Sept 23, 2021 5:38:22 GMT -5
Is this trade valid since it doesn't get the Texans to the roster minimum? Not sure how we are approaching teams that are under or over rosters. I would think that the validity of a trade wouldn't be based upon meeting, or working toward meeting the roster minimum, as the Rules explicitly state the requirements.
However, imho, as a separate transaction, Texans probably should incur some sort of penalty for remaining in non-compliance with the failure to timely meet minimum requirements. Especially since a warning has already been issued before the deadline and more than adequate time has passed to reach it. |
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Sept 23, 2021 5:41:21 GMT -5
Although I'm not sure of HOW this trade helps Texans sort her team out as she expresses, it does not take away from active roster limit.
Approve 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Panthers GM (Jesse) on Sept 23, 2021 9:45:19 GMT -5
I’m sorry. Went back and forth on this a lot, Texans don’t have a ton of assets and are on the verge of being an extremely difficult rebuild. A 2nd is not enough for a young WR who showed so much promise, even if he did start this season hurt. It’s just not enough, especially when the Lions pick probably won’t exactly be a top 10 pick.There are a lot of moves that need to be made on the roster, getting rid of Aiyuk isn’t one of them.
Veto 1-1
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington GM (Blaine) on Sept 23, 2021 13:02:16 GMT -5
I have been going back and forth on this trade. I think there are two things against it, Houston roster limit issue and the compensation on this trade. I agree with Jesse’s assessment on this trade. It’s hard for me to approve a trade when one team is really low on overall talent and are trading one of their only talented young pieces and only getting a projected low 2nd rd pick for him. Aiyuk showed great upside last year and once he is healthy he will reclaim his glory in my opinion. Ultimately, I just feel there are too many questions around this deal to approve
Veto 1-2
|
|
|
|
Post by Titans GM (Ricky) on Sept 23, 2021 13:44:03 GMT -5
I tend to struggle with these kind of deals. I agree with the previous GM's it's a short sell on the upside of Aiyuk. I usually lean more to letting GM's build their team as they see fit. In this circumstance though I feel the state of the Texans roster comes into question with this kind of deal.
Joyner is already out for the year. If it was a different player or pick coming back to the Texans with the 2nd might have worked out better. With Cincy previously being over roster limits and Texans under would have been a nice opportunity to switch up some of that depth to help both rosters. Anyways just some thoughts. If these GM's still want to get this done sure they can figure it out.
Veto 1-3
|
|
|
|
Post by BuccaneersGM (Greg) on Sept 23, 2021 13:55:55 GMT -5
VETOED (1-3).
|
|
