|
|
Post by Bills GM (Commissioner) on Jul 29, 2013 19:06:20 GMT -5
Should we do 2 division games or one and a random schedule?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Commissioner) on Jul 29, 2013 19:07:20 GMT -5
poll will end in one week
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts GM (Darryl) on Jul 29, 2013 19:09:24 GMT -5
I voted for two. Could be a traditional thing, but for the most part I believe it's easier to measure and determine playoff spots
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Commissioner) on Jul 29, 2013 19:34:03 GMT -5
playoff spots could be easier if your in it with 3 games with your division opponents total i dont think it would vary much with 6. i like both sides but would also like to play more teams in a season.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lions GM on Jul 29, 2013 19:40:38 GMT -5
I vote once.I would like to play more different teams in a season
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2013 19:41:24 GMT -5
voted
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 30, 2013 10:34:22 GMT -5
I vote once.I would like to play more different teams in a season |
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Jul 30, 2013 11:55:07 GMT -5
The divisional battles are the key, and winning your division first always ought to be your first goal. How each team in your division matches up should be the objective just like it is in NFL. For every chess move made by a divisional rival, the primary concern should be by the other teams in that division. A one game sample within the division is too small, especially when your talking about tie breakers with a one game sample that can be determined by a whim or an injury. The two game battles are essential, let the tradition stand, it has been well thought out through the ages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bills GM (Commissioner) on Aug 3, 2013 18:00:42 GMT -5
bump, please vote guys
|
|
