|
|
Post by Cowboys GM (Frank) on Nov 29, 2016 16:19:32 GMT -5
It seems to me that this rule awards the team with the weaker schedule,for example the Bears and Cowboys tiebreaker was won by the bears because the bears had almost 200 points less against them then the cowboys even though the cowboys had the same record and more points scored, to me that seems like the bears made it cause of a weaker schedule and the better team is out so I was thinking strength of schedule would be the better way to go.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Nov 29, 2016 17:05:21 GMT -5
It seems to me that this rule awards the team with the weaker schedule,for example the Bears and Cowboys tiebreaker was won by the bears because the bears had almost 200 points less against them then the cowboys even though the cowboys had the same record and more points scored, to me that seems like the bears made it cause of a weaker schedule and the better team is out so I was thinking strength of schedule would be the better way to go. Frank, I think you bring up a great point, I think we can definitely look at this rule a little closer and maybe come up with a better solution. I will put it at the top of the list come this offseason starting in January. Thank you for bringing this up. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2016 5:19:53 GMT -5
I actually agree, in Dynasty we do SoS and SoV using the teams records for them, so I could end up with a 92-52 SoS and a 77-67 SoV depending on who I beat in my schedule. This rewards teams who have difficult schedules and finish level with teams on a poor schedule rather than the other way around which is how the system currently works.
I'd scrap points scored and point differential completely
|
|
