|
Post by Rams GM (Frank) on Dec 13, 2016 15:15:35 GMT -5
This is another issue we have talked about in detail. See here: legacynfl.boards.net/thread/4377/retired-player-cap-hitThe zero cap hit for retired players needs to be retired, and GM's that offer long term lucrative contracts need to be held accountable for their contractual agreements. While a few ideas have been tossed around, my proposal is very simple, whatever the cap hit at any point in time, that's what the cap hit will be for the duration of the retired players contract. For example, the cap hit in this league is currently 30%, any contract signed within the stated percentage will be held accountable until the agreed contract expires. If we were to raise or lower the cap hit, the those contracts signed within that time frame would take the cap hit that was agreed to for that period of time in the league. We would also grandfather clause any players that have been previously signed when there was a zero cap hit, but it is up to the team GM to provide the documented evidence of when this player was signed, you would need a link to the post for previous years free agent signing of that player.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2016 0:37:11 GMT -5
Totally agree. There are a lot of 4 year big money deals given to guys that will be lucky to make it 2 more years and I think GM's are hoping that he retires after one or two years. Thus they get the freed cap space without any penalty.
|
|
|
Post by BuccaneersGM (Greg) on Dec 14, 2016 13:28:44 GMT -5
I agree with this one. If we just charge the cap hit, long term contracts with older players become a thing of the past.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2016 4:44:52 GMT -5
i'm on board with this, you sign a player to the 4 yr deal you should be held accountable for the full 4 yrs....... the only exception should be in the case of injury, maybe then we could possibly have some kind of "career ending injury clause"....
|
|